Select Page

Nice Words

Nice Words

November 1, 2018 (1,699 words)

Christendom College is a small Catholic institution of higher learning located on the outskirts of a sleepy little Shenandoah Valley town by the name of Front Royal, Virginia. It prides itself on being faithful to the Church’s Magisterium, and maintains this fidelity by steering clear of any federal funding. No small feat, in today’s world of high-cost education.

The college recently completed a two-year fund-raising campaign, which had the familiar objectives of all such campaigns: erecting new buildings – in this case a much larger chapel on campus – increasing the school’s endowment, and adding to its operating budget to handle the steady uptick in enrollment being experienced.

In announcing the successful completion of the campaign, Dr. Timothy O’Donnell, the school’s President since 1992, had this to say:

“We can respond by boldly proclaiming that Christ is King, and we want to affirm that He is King, that His mother is Queen, and that He will have a place where he will rule, where he will be honored, and the great Eucharistic sacrifice will be offered daily here, on Christendom’s campus, with fidelity to the Church’s Magisterium, and with devotion, love, and passion.”


… inspirational talk coming from presidential mouths


You won’t hear this sort of inspirational language coming from presidential mouths at any of our country’s well-known, high-enrollment Catholic universities (e.g., Fordham, Georgetown, Notre Dame, et al), for one very simple reason. Their Catholic mission has been severely compromised by federal money. The worm turned back in 1967, when the infamous Land O’Lakes statement about “academic freedom” opened the door to a king’s ransom in government funding. Christendom College was founded a decade later by historian Warren H. Carroll as an antidote to such fundamental corruption.

That it has been able to not only maintain its educational integrity all these years, but indeed prosper in a less-than-favorable environment, is a supreme tribute to the commitment and dedication of the administration and faculty, starting with Dr. O’Donnell. And it is also due in no small measure to the fund-raising prowess Dr. O’Donnell has been able to develop and demonstrate over the years.

Would that there were more places like Christendom that we could send our children and grandchildren to be educated at the college level. It is truly a beacon in the darkness, and may it continue to find favor with families who know a good thing when they see it.


… Christ is King everywhere, not just on Christendom’s campus


At the risk of sounding a sour note amidst the jubilation, allow me to point out that Christ is supposed to be King not just on the campus of Christendom College, but across our great nation, and throughout the entire world.

Christendom does a fine job training its charges to bring a reliably Catholic perspective to bear on cultural matters. But that is only half the battle. Stepping off the hallowed ground of Christendom’s campus one enters a world where Profit is King. And Christendom’s curriculum as it is presently constituted, for all its other praiseworthy attributes, does not address this underlying disconnect.

The political science department there still teaches that our present iteration of free-market capitalism is unabashedly congruent with Christian principles in general, and with Catholic social teaching as articulated via papal teaching since 1891, in particular.

This is a most unfortunate oversight, and amounts to an Achilles heel. What is preventing Christendom from tackling the last piece of the Magisterium’s puzzle? I can’t say for sure, since I’m not there. But from the outside it would seem its administration and faculty are hamstrung by what is a very common misreading of the economic landscape on the part of those who consider themselves to be religiously orthodox.


… a common misreading of the economic landscape


As the 20th century chugged along one of its most disconcerting developments was how religious orthodoxy became inextricably entwined with political conservatism. Because such conservatism has always been aligned with an every-man-for-himself “free market,” which simply cannot be reconciled with Christian principles.

Stated plainly, when it comes to the economic question, conservatives do not conduct themselves as Christians. The liberty and the freedom at the heart of our Founding – which conservatives take such pride in and are forever crowing about – give the clever and advantaged license to run roughshod over those lesser mortals ill-equipped to duke it out in a survival-of-the-fittest competition.

Of course liberty and freedom are synonyms for “individual emancipation,” and it is the absolute emancipation of the individual that the ideology known as classical liberalism has bequeathed to us. It is this “emancipation” from any objective, moral restraint that inspired the idea of a liberal democracy in the first place.

The United States set out to be the perfect embodiment of what a liberal democracy could be. It was never intended to be an expression of Christianity, as many hopefuls continue to insist, despite some reassuring words uttered by a few of the more upright Founders.


…liberal democracy is the antithesis of “Christ is King”


Religious freedom, or religious pluralism (the antithesis of “Christ is King”), is the cultural touchstone of a liberal democracy, with economic freedom (aka free-market capitalism) being its economic touchstone.

What Christendom College does not quite seem to understand, at least to my way of thinking, is how the very thing they are arrayed against in the cultural arena, they continue to embrace in the economic arena.

But maybe I shouldn’t hold this against my favorite college too much, since to date no one else operating anywhere in academia has been able to untangle this thorny issue, either.

Perhaps it is up to those of us who operate out here in the land where Profit is King to show the way for our ivory tower friends. So to all those wealthy benefactors who helped Christendom exceed its recent fund-raising goals, I have a few questions…

How do you make your money? Does the firm you work for or represent “make available to the public quality goods and services at fair prices”? Or to put it a slightly different way, does your firm “meet the needs of the world with goods that are truly good and truly serve.”

The first guideline is from the Business Roundtable, circa 1981. The second guideline is from the Pontifical Council on Justice and Peace, circa 2012.


…objective guidelines for morally licit business behavior


Do you run your own show? If you are a successful business owner with a payroll, implementing Catholic social teaching begins with seeing to it that employees receive a just distribution of the profit being generated by the business, according to their proportional contribution.

To do this, the entrepreneurial owner must forcibly set aside the rugged, trailblazer mindset that “I took all the risks, and put in all those outrageously long hours, so I deserve the rewards.” This attitude comes to us courtesy of classical liberalism, the Protestant Reformation, and the Enlightenment, and has absolutely nothing to do with a traditional Catholic understanding.

As a breed entrepreneurs are typically bright, industrious, and natural-born problem solvers. These special talents are bestowed on the entrepreneurial spirit by the Creator. In the right order of things, such an individual would seek to use their talents for the benefit of the common or greater good. Doing so contributes to the material well-being and yes, even to the spiritual well-being of society as a whole.

Therefore, the first fruit of the entrepreneurial gift should be gainful and justly-compensated employment for others, rather than merely the building up of one’s own pile of loot.

Promoting altruistic concepts in the workplace such as the common good and individual dignity is nothing but a simple acknowledgment that every employee who is conscientious and hard-working deserves a living wage that allows full participation in the economic and social realms of human existence.


…applying “love thy neighbor” to your employees


It boils down to applying that old chestnut “love thy neighbor as thyself” to one’s employees, not just to the guy who lives next door.

What of Christendom College’s wealthy benefactors who are products of huge corporate conglomerates, who have made their money by being good company men and women? While I have less inside experience with that world, my instincts tell me the more money you are being paid by said large firm, the more likely you are to be doing something you might not be so proud of.

Look, we all have to make a living and support our family, and a lone individual will not be able to change the course of a major corporation in any meaningful way. But perhaps one can maintain one’s integrity in smaller increments. Such as not accepting every last promotion that pushes you further up the org chart, thereby making you that much more complicit in activity that falls outside the Business Roundtable’s and the Pontifical Council’s definition of morally licit business behavior.

As a general rule, the more money we find ourselves with, the more questionable some of our behavior has probably been. For those of us who are clever or advantaged, for whom unfettered capitalism is working quite well, thank you very much, implementing Catholic social teaching on the economic question will more than likely mean we end up having less money.

Writing a big, health check to a worthy cause is all well and good. But our tax deduction philanthropy will not balance the books when it comes time to face the four last things. Better to try and tame the raging Profit is King mentality in whatever modest way we are able to initiate. No matter if that effort results in our having less spare cash to throw at worthy causes.

Forcing our self-centered capitalist system to function more fairly will eventually yield tangible results for those earnest, salt-of-the-earth Christendom College students we are so eager to help educate. These highly motivated young adults are among the last people on earth who graduate, get married, and start big families. Only to then find themselves struggling within an economic framework that cares not a whit for their well-being.

Robert J. Cavanaugh, Jr.
November 1, 2018

Use the contact form below to email me.

9 + 12 =

Traversing Mexico

Traversing Mexico

October 29, 2018 (92 words) The caravan of men, women, and children currently walking from Guatemala to Texas hoping to find a better life at the end of their long march, prompts the following question: How bad would things have to be here in the western suburbs of Philadelphia, where I have always lived, for me to light out on foot one morning for say, Rapid City, South Dakota – the equivalent to traversing all of Mexico – in search of a brighter future? Robert J. Cavanaugh, Jr. October 29, 2018

Use the contact form below to email me.

15 + 15 =

Why Do You Stay?

Why Do You Stay?

October 22, 2018 (779 words)

This is the question now being asked of Catholics, as the accusations and indictments in the ongoing clerical sex abuse scandal seem to pile up, one after the other.

It is being asked of those who still observe the Holy Days of obligation, make the sign of the cross in public, say their morning and evening prayers, attend Mass, go to Confession, and receive Holy Eucharist.

The inquisitors imply that anyone still performing such childish rituals in the wake of these scandals – rituals which, by the way, were rendered meaningless some time ago by our brilliant secular humanists, who call the tune for the cognoscenti – represents a special breed of emotionally and intellectually stunted sheep.


… my allegiance is to a transcendent idea, not an institution


My allegiance, if you must know, has always been to a transcendent idea, rather than to an institution. Though I do recognize the institution in question has been divinely inspired, if charged with a next-to-impossible task: Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Considering the raw material it has been given to work with.

And I am grateful to that institution for training the clergy responsible for administering the sacraments to me throughout my life. I have always embraced the pomp and circumstance that attend those sacraments as an appropriate sign of reverence due the three persons of our Triune God.

That some members of the clergy have forsaken their vows regarding chastity is a tragedy for all concerned. Their transgressions against innocent youth or compromised young adults cry out to heaven for justice.

But these crimes of passion did not happen in a vacuum. Certain priests have succumbed to the spirit of the age, yielding to the temptations offered by the sexual revolution that has gone mainstream. Their sins, like those of the laity in this same area of activity, are not a game-changer for me.


…succumbing to the spirit of the age


That some of our bishops have failed in their duty, either by completely misreading the severity of the sexual crimes being committed, or by assuming a tone-deaf determination to protect the reputation of their respective dioceses, is no less a tragedy that also demands justice.

They, too, have succumbed to the spirit of the age, by letting their guard down on the scourge of homosexuality within their ranks. And by being too inclined to paper over an inconvenient truth in order to maintain good public relations and keep the physical plant humming along.

The story of the street-level perpetrators would seem to be fairly cut and dried: they gave in to temptation and fell short of holiness. The culpability of the overseer bishops, however, is more nuanced. They became too far removed from their rank-and-file constituents, whose sons were the primary victims of all this abuse. Losing touch with what is happening on the ground is a recurring theme in any large institution.

Big organizations require big-time executives who can manage and properly administer the portfolio of assets, the huge pile of working capital, and the sprawling org chart. Along these lines, the Catholic Church is possibly the largest organization known to man.


…lacking intestinal fortitude, and the powerful allure of privilege


Some of its ordained execs are better at their demanding jobs than others. Not all prove to have the intestinal fortitude required to effectively lead. Some eventually fall short by acquiescing to the powerful allure of privilege.

When it comes to trying to understand and emulate Christ’s message, my money has always been on individual practitioners, the sole proprietors of the faith, if you will. Like John the Baptist, the four Evangelists, the Desert Fathers, and the roll call of stalwart men and women who have been designated as doctors of the Church.

People who distinguished themselves by dint of their example, rather than the prestige bestowed by a high ecclesiastical office that duty or ambition may have thrust upon them.

What is it that Chesterton says about Francis of Assisi? His whole life was a poem. And where does Dante tells us in Canto XIX corrupt bishops will end up? Why, in the Eighth Circle of Hell.

So as any objective observer can clearly see, some things never change. Solving the riddle of why this pilgrim is staying the course despite the abhorrent behavior of certain priests and bishops – each one merely another in a long line of weak and fallible human beings – is really not that hard to decipher. Where else on earth would I want to go?

Robert J. Cavanaugh, Jr.
October 22, 2018

Use the contact form below to email me.

13 + 6 =

Burying The Lead

Burying The Lead

October 15, 2018 (1,157 words) Archbishop Charles J. Chaput of Philadelphia has recently reasserted his long-standing opposition to any revision of the statute of limitations in Pennsylvania on the reporting of sexual abuse of minors from past decades. As he has previously stated on numerous occasions, any sort of retroactive “window” or “reviver” legislation to address long-past abuse would be, in his view, “unjust to the innocent Catholic laypeople, clergy, and families who make up our communities today. In the sense that the legal claims such legislation might inevitably lead to would be financially disastrous” to Catholic ministries and parishes throughout all eight dioceses across the state. This latest reminder was presented in an open letter distributed to all 257 parishes in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia over the last weekend in September. But the Most Rev. Chaput also took this opportunity to announce a new voluntary plan to help abuse victims whose claims are time-barred.

… a voluntary plan to help victims whose claims are time-barred


This is a good move. While the Archbishop is wise to try and protect the Church’s good work from possible financial ruin, that stance on its own has always given the unfortunate impression of turning something of a blind eye and a deaf ear when it comes to addressing the legitimate claims of the victims. The details of this brand-new, just-proposed voluntary plan to help abuse victims are still under development. But the bishops who lead all eight Pennsylvania dioceses announced their commitment to the plan in a joint statement that was released on September 21. Such a course of action, we are told, “will require extraordinary Church resources,” but the hope is “it can avoid the bitter litigation and diocesan bankruptcies that will follow any destructive changes in the statute of limitations.” Will such a voluntary plan appease the Church’s critics? That remains to be seen. While there is no denying the widespread nature of the clerical abuse that has taken place, it is also true that only a small minority out of a vast army of ordained, celibate men were involved.

… a critical mass of people who oppose the Church’s stance on chastity


There is also no denying the Catholic Church has been singled out for such investigations and prosecutions. That’s probably because her centralized organization makes her an easy target. But it’s also no secret she has always had a critical mass of serious enemies – that is to say, people who oppose what she stands for, starting with chastity – in this country. Here in the Philadelphia archdiocese, Archbishop Chaput has established something of a model program for addressing clerical sex abuse, moving forward. Accessing the web site www.archpila.org will yield a wealth of information regarding safeguards now in place to prevent any such abuse from happening, and detailing a commitment to reporting any new claims that may arise directly to the civil authorities. The entire package is an impressive demonstration of the two things the Church’s many vocal critics are clamoring for: more transparency, and more lay oversight. So a tip of the hat is due the Archbishop for addressing the concerns of the general populace.

… the faithful still wait for a full moral reckoning


While all this amounts to a very thorough legal reckoning, it strikes me that we, the lay faithful, are still waiting for a full moral reckoning. Such an accounting would rightfully involve a detailed discussion of where this unprecedented crisis came from, and why it was allowed to persist. What exactly prompted some of our priests to think it was perfectly normal to “get it on” with young boys and adolescents? In this sense, this latest round of responses to the on-going prosecution of the now-past (we sincerely hope and pray) instances of clerical sex abuse is still “burying the lead” to an important extent. That lead should involve nothing less than a full-out expose of the sexual revolution, which affected us all in a profound way, laity along with ordained men and religious women alike. It did not start in the 1960s, as is popularly thought, though that’s certainly when it did go “mainstream” with a bang and gained widespread acceptance. A big part of that revolution was the normalization of homosexuality. And all this dramatic social upheaval occurred at precisely the same moment the Catholic Church in this country decided it had nothing to fear from, and could therefore afford to get cozy with, the modern world. In other words, just as the modern world was taking yet another disastrous turn for the worse.

… what got us into this mess in the first place?


I’m wondering if the reason we are not getting a full moral reckoning is because it would require many of our leading prelates to confront how their newfound sense of “respecting the differences of various moral traditions” is exactly what got us into this mess to begin with. What I am talking about here would fall under the heading of “error has no rights, but people do,” one of the cherished formulations to emerge from Vatican II. In his comprehensive response to the crisis, yet another thing Archbishop Chaput can rightly be credited with is his recent, late September encouragement to have the lay faithful and clergy say the Prayer of St. Michael in all Philadelphia parishes and institutions. The prayer reads as follows: “Saint Michael the Archangel, defend us in battle, be our defense against the wickedness and snares of the devil. May God rebuke him, we humbly pray; and do thou, O Prince of the heavenly host, by the power of God, thrust into hell Satan and the other evil spirits who prowl about the world seeking the ruin of souls.” This simple prayer was written by Pope Leo XIII in 1866. Leo is also the guy who wrote an entire encyclical in 1899 on the dangers of “Americanism” that were by then infiltrating and undermining the faith on these shores. The full title of that document is Testem Benevolentiae Nostrae (Concerning New Opinions, Virtue, Nature and Grace, With Regards To Americanism). It remains as relevant for the insight it provides into our wayward tendencies as the day it was written. I mention this because as careful and caring as Archbishop Chaput’s open letter from late September is, it feels like something is missing. That sense is encapsulated for me in his last sentence: “We need to ground ourselves in the Lord, the Church and each other; and if we do, there will come a time when today’s anger and confusion are behind us.” All true statements. But the source of our anger and confusion has not yet been properly addressed, has it? What brought on this clerical sex abuse crisis? Why have so many of our priests chosen to ignore and violate their vows at this juncture in the Church’s history? Robert J. Cavanaugh, Jr. October 15, 2018

Use the contact form below to email me.

9 + 13 =

Bernie and Elizabeth

Bernie and Elizabeth

October 5, 2018 (1,829 words)

There are probably not too many practicing Catholics walking around today who both revere the practical wisdom contained in the Magisterium, and value the practical advice on economic policy offered by Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.

In fact, I may be the president, treasurer, chief cook and bottle washer of that particular club at the moment.

Mr. Sanders has been faithfully making the case for economic justice and equitable distribution since he entered public life in the early 1990s. Ms. Warren on the other hand is a relative newcomer to public service, having left academia after making her bones as a prominent scholar specializing in bankruptcy law.

In the wake of the financial collapse of 2008 she served as chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel which was created to supervise the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). She later served as Special Advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Then she decided to run for the Senate in the 2012 election cycle.

While the economic proscriptions of these two New England politicians are similar and often considered in the same breath, they are not identical. This may be common knowledge to those more informed than myself, but I have only recently been schooled on this subject by the journalist Josh Barro, who currently contributes to Business Insider as a political commentator.


… the right antidote to both socialism and Trumpism


His July 28 entry, “Capitalist Elizabeth Warren has the right antidote to socialism and Trumpism,” is the source of my continuing education. Mr. Barro begins his piece as follows:

“Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s recent remark that she is a ‘capitalist to my bones’ is being treated as some kind of news, even though it is consistent with the policies and rhetoric the liberal Massachusetts senator has espoused for her entire career.

“Warren’s major policy project is to make markets work right for regular people. If you want to make markets work well, then obviously you are in favor of markets and capitalism…. Warren’s choice to own her capitalism is good news for the Democratic Party, and for capitalism.

“…Over the last 15 years, as markets have repeatedly failed, the market-first approach has become a political liability for Republicans and is increasingly discredited within the Democratic Party. As a result there is now fashion for people on the left to call themselves ‘socialists’ – often while implicitly or explicitly supporting many of the markets-with-guardrails policies Warren herself favors.”

While conservative Republicans may be put off by young (b. 1984) Mr. Barro’s current affiliation with the Democratic party, or by the fact that he identifies as gay and considers himself an atheist, my advice to that crowd would be to shelve your knee-jerk aversion and concentrate on the economic proscriptions under consideration.

(Editor’s Note: In my vocabulary “shelve” is not the same as “ignore.” Personally, I am hoping we can manage to somehow navigate the wide terrain that exists between “acquiesce” and “condemn.” Why bog down in passing judgement, when it’s not our place to do so, and when these errant self-identifications are not permanent or irreversible. Since there is every reason to believe A Road to Damascus moment awaits us all, it would make more sense to simply pray for Josh Barro’s impending epiphany.)

Barro, who is the son of Harvard’s macroeconomist Robert Barro, and who himself earned a bachelor’s degree in psychology from Harvard, offers a valuable perspective for anyone with a serious interest in improving economic justice and equitable distribution.


…a rough 15 years for capitalism’s reputation


As an example of his unique perspective, Mr. Barro is able to admit that “capitalism’s brand has had a rough 15 years,” while in the very next breath acknowledging “America is going to be capitalist, so we had better make capitalism work.”

Without wanting to get too deep into the policy weeds, or quote the entire piece verbatim, allow me to offer a few highlights that I hope will properly frame the context. As Josh Barro tells us,

“There are two, broad theoretical approaches that can lead you to the same left-leaning policy platform. You can start from free markets and layer on government interventions as necessary to make those markets stable, functional and fair. Or you can start from central planning and introduce market features where the government cannot efficiently allocate capital from on high.

“You can even design the same policy platform from either of these approaches, calling it ‘capitalist’ in one case and ‘socialist’ in the other. This is how Warren and Sen. Bernie Sanders are not that far apart on policy, despite their very different rhetoric about capitalism.


… the direction you approach the policy from matters


“But which direction you approach the policy from matters. And if your system will continue to rely on private capital, as virtually every modern political platform claiming to be ‘socialism’ does, it’s to your advantage to place markets front and center, as Warren does, because you’ll have to explain how you’ll make those markets work well.

“Instead, Sanders’s broad rhetoric about a ‘rigged system’ counsels despair. His focus on wealth inequality is akin to Donald Trump’s obsession with trade deficits – it elevates an economic indicator the government cannot directly control, leading to sure disappointment when four years of policy fail to materially change its level.

“Warren’s markets-up approach has a big advantage in the American political context. For one, it starts from where we are today: A market economy with insufficient and ill-designed regulation in many sectors, with less economic redistribution than is desirable, that is not working as well for ordinary people as it should.

“And a bottom-up approach lends itself better to developing concrete, incremental, affordable policies that you can actually implement to make markets better, in everything from labor to health care to higher education to financial products.”

I don’t know about you, but reading such economic analysis from Josh Barro gives me goose bumps. Let’s hope his influence increases as his career advances.

But I see no need to elevate one politician over the other. That is to say, Bernie Sanders’s broad rhetoric about a “rigged system” has always struck me as right on target, and never once has led me to despair.

Similarly, if someone as brilliant as Josh Barro can one day acquaint himself with the guidelines for achieving economic justice and equitable distribution offered in an impressive line of papal encyclicals, starting in 1891 and continuing right through to the present moment, we might actually get somewhere on this subject.

Robert J. Cavanaugh, Jr.
October 14, 2018

Use the contact form below to email me.

13 + 2 =

Sexual Politics and Irony

Sexual Politics and Irony

October 11, 2018 (201 words) I seem to recall being on the receiving end of some less-than-friendly banter during my late teens and early twenties, over what was interpreted at the time to be a certain reticence on my part toward the opposite sex. The muted derision was prompted by my appearing to hue a bit too closely to the sad-sack image of being a “good Catholic boy.” This sarcastic moniker was applied to any product of what was derided as an overly uptight upbringing, the effects of which constrained the poor soul to sit out the free love with no strings attached movement which was then in full swing. This is the early 1970s we are talking about now. By the early 1980s, when our newly-minted Supreme Court justice, Brett Kavanaugh, exactly ten years my junior, reached the same stage in his development, apparently he and the posse of young men he ran with, first at Georgetown Prep and then at Yale, did not suffer from any such unhealthy inhibitions. In one of those ironic twists of fate, turns out maybe that wasn’t such a good thing, after all. Robert J. Cavanaugh, Jr. October 11, 2018

Use the contact form below to email me.

14 + 9 =