Select Page

A Gaggle of Gay Priests

A Gaggle of Gay Priests

September 1, 2018 (1,198 words)

From my perch outside the enchanted circle, it seems nabbing a spot as a regular commentator in the prestige print media requires a serendipitous combination of talent and connections. When the broadcast media is being considered, be sure to add beauty and a quick wit to the list of requirements.

One can only hold such a coveted position by producing on a regular basis, even if one’s every utterance is less than captivating, and each submission is not quite spellbinding. But once ensconced, the incumbents do hold an advantage over the rest of us.

Because editors and program managers are pre-occupied with assembling their next installment, they have little time to scour the country searching for new voices that offer a different slant. So the undiscovered writers roaming the streets of our big cities and small towns, wrestling with their problems in solitude, retain their anonymity.

Father James Martin, SJ, is one of those lucky designated commentators. His current job description is editor at large for the New York City-based America magazine. Over the years (b. 1960) he has built his brand to where he is routinely called on to offer his opinion on pretty much anything-and-everything having to do with the Catholic Church in the United States.

As anyone who has heard him on the radio, watched him on television, or read any of his written work can attest, Father Martin presents a reasonable and even-tempered persona.


… a disquieting tendency to downplay formal teaching


He also has a somewhat disquieting tendency to downplay the Magisterium when thinking through contemporary problems. This has raised concerns among those who think it best to keep the Magisterium front-and-center whenever one is undertaking any serious social analysis.

For instance, in his recent best-selling outreach to the LGBT community, Building A Bridge, he acknowledges intentionally leaving out any sort of elaborate discussion of Church teaching regarding same-sex attraction. This strikes some observers as a glaring omission, to say the least.

He clearly re-states established doctrine that “sexual relations between persons of the same sex are impermissible,” giving the reader the impression he himself does not disagree with this assessment.

Yet he steers clear of that inconvenient truth as he describes the dire need for “welcoming” on the part of the institutional Church, because he “is not a moral theologian,” and “the LGBT community and the Church are just too far apart on this issue.”

Yes, Father Martin is eminently reasonable and even-tempered in his presentation, and this makes him an effective communicator. But since his higher commitment appears to be to open-ended dialogue rather than ultimate repentance, I’m not sure his talents are being applied in any meaningful or productive way.


… open-ended dialogue vs. ultimate repentance


Take his recent op-ed, The Virtues of Catholic Anger, which appeared in The New York Times on Thursday, August 16.

Father tells us every American Catholic has a right to be angry at the ongoing revelations of sexual abuse by priests. He shares with his readers that he too, is angry, for purely selfish reasons: He has been spat on in the subway, and at times has been embarrassed to wear his collar.

His anger also extends to certain traditional Catholics “who have been using these revelations to advance their own agendas, so that the suffering of children becomes an opportunity to stir up hatred, for example, of all gay priests, or LGBT people in general.”

While many of us can’t help but be angry at times, we know full well the emotion of hatred is always off-limits and should never be indulged if one is trying to emulate a Christian example. So here Father Martin is slapping the wrist of a few out-of-line reactionaries, instead of addressing the larger problem.

In this case that larger problem is the long-term existence of a “pink mafia” in certain seminaries that screened out anyone who showed up with a pre-conciliar understanding of the faith, and encouraged the new recruits who were allowed admittance to “get in touch with their sexuality,” as they say.


… the long-term existence of a “pink mafia”


For more on this story, we turn to Goodbye, Good Men written by Michael S. Rose and published in 2002 by Regnery. Mr. Rose explains how the American Catholic priesthood went from an image of wise, strong men like Spencer Tracy in Boys Town and Bing Crosby in Going My Way to an image of “pedophile priests.”

He does that by shedding light on a homosexual subculture that existed in certain seminaries over a thirty year period leading up to the publication of his book.

To reach his conclusion Mr. Rose interviewed dozens of seminarians, former seminarians, recently ordained priests, seminary faculty members, and vocation directors representing some fifty dioceses and twenty-two major seminaries.

He found our “priest shortage” or “vocations crisis” has been self-inflicted, if you will, caused in large measure by an outright rejection of solid Catholic men who upheld Church teaching on hot-button issues such as women priests, sexual morality, and homosexuality.

Goodbye, Good Men details a decidedly counter-productive situation in which homosexuals on the faculty or among the seminarians made life miserable for seminarians who refused to approve of – or participate in – homosexual activity.

Not only did this result in good men being driven from our seminaries, but their homosexual harassers were the only ones left who went on to Ordination.

It would be a mistake to think the broad clerical abuse crisis has been perpetrated strictly by ordained men with a homosexual inclination. But it would be naïve to think the presence of active homosexuals in the priesthood has not contributed mightily to this crisis.


… what exactly is a “gay priest”, anyway?


What exactly is a “gay priest”, anyway? And how are we to distinguish him from a “straight” one? The question itself makes no sense, since our priests take a vow of celibacy as part of their training. Here again Father Martin is employing a contemporary formulation, presumably in the cause of bridge-building.

For the record I, too, am a big fan of building bridges and encouraging dialogue. In the Catholic tradition, one important venue for such activity is the Sacrament of Reconciliation.

As to Father Martin’s timely thoughts on the virtues of Catholic anger and the so-called hatred of gay priests and LGBT people, I think I read somewhere we are supposed to condemn the sin, while holding out hope of God’s forgiveness to the sinner.

Figuring out how to execute both sentiments simultaneously is a tricky proposition, often beyond the capacity of mere mortals. Most of us fail by either being too lenient or too strict. Finding an appropriate balance between mercy and moral demand is extremely difficult, even on our best day.

With his polished and proven communication skills, Father James Martin, SJ, could do more in the way of showing us how that balance might be achieved, if only he was willing to tackle the really hard subject of bringing the reliable and still very much germane Magisterium to bear on today’s raucous world.

Robert J. Cavanaugh, Jr.
September 1, 2018

Use the contact form below to email me.

12 + 11 =

Ella and Olives

Ella and Olives

August 29, 2018 (187 words) My mother had two enduring passions to the very end of her life: Olives, and the music of Ella Fitzgerald. So every birthday my father came through like clock-work with a can of black olives, a can of green olives, and another selection from the extensive catalogue of Ms. Fitzgerald’s recorded work. In his defense, this was well before the roll-out of extensive “olive bars” that are now a staple in most local supermarkets. And more to the point, circumstances conspired in such a way as to leave him and my mother without two nickels to rub together for most of their all-important child-rearing years. In any event, whatever the man may have lacked in gift-giving prowess, he more than made up for with a life-long demonstration of marital fidelity. Despite repeated exposure in my formative years to this briny fruit that grows on the sunny hillsides of Italy, I never developed a taste for olives. But every time I hear Ella sing, it sounds like my mother is speaking to me. Robert J. Cavanaugh, Jr. August 29, 2018

Use the contact form below to email me.

2 + 7 =

Forsaking Chastity

Forsaking Chastity

August 27, 2018 (1,951 words)

The Catholic Church’s dark night of the soul continues. Earlier this month Pennsylvania’s attorney general issued a scathing report on a handful of dioceses across the state, going back some 70 years, which detailed an alarming 1,000 cases where minors had been sexually abused at the hands of some 300 different priests.

We would expect the ordained men responsible for this abuse to be brought to justice and punished. If the statute of limitations prevents that from happening via the civil authorities, certainly we should receive a full accounting from the respective dioceses involved, at the very least.

Meanwhile our hearts go out to the victims, as we ponder the deep hurt inflicted on the innocents, and pray for their eventual healing


…outrage emanating from all sides


Outrage at this latest report has emanated from all sides, and is completely warranted. Many Catholics have called for dramatic changes in the hierarchical structure of the Church, to allow for more transparency and accountability. Some have called for women to play a more prominent role in exercising authority within the Church. Others have suggested we must do away with the expectation our priests hue to a vow of celibacy. I will leave these hot-button issues for others to debate.

Beyond any administrative or procedural changes that may be suggested and considered, we should also confront and acknowledge how this terrible clerical sex abuse crisis is merely part and parcel of a Church-wide forsaking of chastity.

For a priest to forsake his vow of celibacy – the highest and most demanding form of chastity – is always a personal tragedy. But to do so while using a young boy to indulge his wonton lust – besides being a crime against nature and the faith – is repugnant. While nothing can mitigate the violation of trust such vile actions represent, it is nevertheless worth noting these deeply flawed priests were not operating in a vacuum.

So far the focus has been on how some members of the clergy have let us down. And they surely have. But we are all in this together. The laity has also, to a very real extent, let the clergy down.


… this ongoing crisis cuts both ways


That is to say, while it is right and just to call these wayward priests to account for their deplorable actions, let’s not inadvertently make the mistake of thinking that we – the faithful, the Church Militant – have all been fine, upstanding Catholics on the subject of sexual morality for lo these last 70 years.

Of course nothing is morally equivalent to having sex with a minor, let alone a minor of one’s acquaintance who looks up to you as an authority figure. Not to mention an authority figure presumed to be “holy” and a representative of Christ on earth.

We certainly need to expose the ugly history of clerical sex abuse, once and for all. Appropriate action needs to be taken against the men who did it, and the men who failed to stop it. And steps must be followed to assure this sort of thing no longer happens.

But in my view we would also benefit from understanding how these unhinged priests – a small, infinitesimal minority, by all accounts – were merely answering the exact same siren call of illicit and unsanctioned sex that has enveloped our entire culture, and undermined our commitment to chastity, over the course of the last 70 years.


… consider the wreckage created by those who went rogue


Yes, we certainly expect a priest to hold to a higher standard – meaning celibacy and not just chastity – and the overwhelming majority has done so and continues to do so. But look at the wreckage created by the few priests who went rogue.

So it is with those of us who did not choose to enter the seminary and become a priest. Choosing the vocation of marriage does not constrain us to celibacy, but we are nevertheless expected to live out the virtue of chastity. Yes, that’s correct, even married people. To do otherwise is to fall victim to treating one’s covenantal spouse as little more than a sex doll.

But that’s not the message that has been transmitted to us by the culture over the last 70 years, is it? More alarming is the fact that we haven’t heard much about this concept of chastity-within-marriage from the Church herself. Whose fault is that?

Yes, some of the blame can be laid on our schools, for spending too much time focusing on “creating the leaders of tomorrow” instead of instilling the important virtues that should define our existence. And we can maybe also blame our priests to some extent for a less-than-ardent commitment to preach on this counter-cultural virtue, still expected of all married people, from the pulpit.

But at a certain point we – the faithful, the Church Militant – have to step up and shoulder our fair share of the blame. We have allowed ourselves to become lax. Church teaching on such important matters as sexual morality remains as profound as it has always been. But it requires an obedient and receptive congregation prepared to give such teaching the careful consideration it deserves.


… sexual license has been advocated in every age


Sexual license has been advocated in every age. The Church’s point of view regarding chastity has always run counter to popular opinion. Given their druthers most people would prefer to do what feels good right away, even if that feeling doesn’t last and proves to be corrosive in the long run.

A short and by no means comprehensive list of those who actively disparaged chastity and carried the banner of lascivious behavior forward in the first half of the 20th century would include such luminaries as Wilhelm Reich, John B. Watson, Alfred Kinsey, and the great popularizer himself, Hugh Hefner. These people and others like them laid the groundwork and built the scaffolding on which we now stand.

There is no denying a “grand accommodation” took place in the 1960s between the Catholic Church and the modern world. We were all led to believe that things had changed, that we could let it all hang out along with everybody else, and still manage to be good Catholics.

Academic freedom, all the rage at the time, meant we no longer had to concern ourselves with outdated theological concepts such as “sin.” And there was certainly no longer any such thing as “temptation,” since one was encouraged to express oneself by doing whatever one felt like, at any given moment, with whoever happened to be in the vicinity.

Right about now some of you may be thinking, “Wait a minute, I never had any sort of extramarital affair. I never strayed. I have been faithful.” Well, there are sins of omission as well as sins of commission, aren’t there. If we married Catholics had actually been as faithful all these years as we think we’ve been, and lived out the virtue of chastity within our marriages as we should have, the culture never would have drifted in the worrisome way it has.


… lay people need to stand their moral ground


Consider how our advertising and entertainment industries now traffic in soft-core porn as their stock in trade. How all our popular entertainment features tantalizing images of extremely attractive males and females in various stages of undress, if not actually performing intimate acts once reserved for the privacy of the marital bedroom.

None of this would have come to pass if Catholic lay people had stood their ground, refused to buy the suggestively-advertised products or watch the salacious moving images. Such a boycott worked extremely well here in Philadelphia in the 1930s, and would no doubt be just as effective today.

Unfortunately, in order to maintain our bona fides as hip contemporaries with zero hang-ups, we have ceded all moral authority to cultural arbiters whose vision of sexual activity in particular, and virtuous behavior in general, is the polar opposite of what we were taught it should be.

Let’s face it, folks, due to our fallen nature we silently revel in the suggestive advertising and the salacious entertainment. To reference a relatively tame example, Catholics peruse the infamous swimsuit edition of Sports Illustrated right along with all the other apostates, every spring.

No one is looking over our shoulder anymore, telling us to mind our p’s and q’s and behave ourselves. Since we are simply going with the flow and following the crowd, we can’t be singled out and accused of helping to undermine public decency or damage the social fabric.

In the process, almost without our realizing what was going on, the very word chastity has been stricken from the vocabulary. It is now a foreign concept from a bygone era.


… a perfectly good word, stricken from the vocabulary


That’s too bad, since chastity remains what is has always been. It’s one of Seven Contrary Virtues which are understood as specific opposites to the Seven Deadly Sins. Chastity is meant to keep us from lust, and should be emulated by every adult who seeks the moderation of sexual desire that forms the basis of moral living.

Though “self-control” is now a frowned upon phrase, the overwhelming sex drive we have been blessed with is an important part of our nature, and is intended for a specific purpose, even if that purpose may be hard to fathom in the heat of passion. It is to be directed toward the unitive and procreative functions that make marriage a unique, life-long union between a man and a woman.

This simple, declarative sentence can take a lifetime to properly comprehend. So don’t despair. Keep plugging away at it. The wisdom will eventually reveal itself to you. Figuring out how chastity is best expressed in a faithful marriage is an involved conversation. But if you are married, you should be having that conversation.

By casting aside their sacred vow of celibacy, certain priests have committed some very grave sins for which they will have to answer at the final judgement. And hurt many vulnerable young people in the process. But the laity should be careful not to let a justifiable indignation dominant their thoughts. The take-away is the Church had it right to begin with, and should never have allowed herself to be compromised in the name of being ecumenical.

We need to step back and realize this compromise has impacted us all, clergy and laity alike. We should take up the cause of the seven virtues, as reliable antidotes to the seven deadly sins, once again. Maybe if we start openly practicing these virtues, our priests will find it easier to preach about them. And if we stop indulging our lust, no matter how small and inconsequential we may consider those improprieties to be, such an example may help keep our priests from indulging theirs.

Yes, any wayward priest – and the prelates who either offered cover or worse, participated in such behavior themselves – is something we should all be concerned with. Let’s eradicate the rot. But let us also acknowledge that scandals will be a part of Church life as long as the church is made up of weak, fallible humans who are too easily led into temptation.

For those who are calling for more lay partition in the leadership of the Church, let’s start with this. Let’s lead by acknowledging how we, the independent laity, have in too many instances chosen to forsake chastity, in what we have done, and what we have failed to do.

Robert J. Cavanaugh, Jr.
August 27, 2018

Use the contact form below to email me.

14 + 15 =

A Free Education

A Free Education

August 23, 2018 (290 words) Many of us admire Ken Langone for his shrewd business acumen and his generous philanthropic efforts. And we agree that his recent $100 million contribution to help fund “A Free Tuition Education” ( Wall Street Journal op-ed, Aug 21) is “pretty cool.” Even cooler, though, would be if successful entrepreneurs of Mr. Langone’s stature were able to disrupt the business model and creatively innovate so that some of this prodigious wealth would trickle down to the rank-and-file workers who toil in these massively scaled-up retail operations. That Home Depot, Mr. Langone’s special brainchild and claim to fame, employs some 400,000 people is quite an accomplishment. But does the WSJ really believe all those low-paying jobs “provide a livelihood”? Let us set aside such facile bromides as “this is how a free society creates wealth and then redistributes it.” Using the philanthropy of the select few to justify the often cut-throat and inconsiderate aspects of our dynamic economic engine is not quite cricket. And then there’s the catchy WSJ formulation: “Socialism creates little wealth and redistributes poverty.” Honestly, folks, let’s all agree no thinking person can possibly favor socialism, and move the discussion on from there. The challenge we face is how to make capitalism work better for those who are not clever or advantaged. Even non-vested employees and their families should be able to experience a dignified existence, and have a reasonable chance at full participation in the social realm of our great society. This means more than affordable access to a dazzling array of cheap consumer goods, which in the end proves to be a very thin gruel indeed. Robert J. Cavanaugh, Jr. August 23, 2018

Use the contact form below to email me.

13 + 1 =

How and When to Die

How and When to Die

August 12, 2018 (2,776 words)

We all start out thinking we’ll live to a ripe old age, and die peacefully in our sleep. But eventually we come to realize that aging gracefully and dying gently is a rare circumstance, experienced only by the select few. If not felled prematurely by a debilitating disease for which no cure has yet been found, most of us tend to fall apart in stages, piece by humiliating piece.

In order to fend off decrepitude and keep the deteriorating organism going, the older population willingly submits to a series of pokes and prods and tests and procedures. One the one hand, we talk of being ready to accept the inevitable when our time comes. Yet we are only too quick to partake of the latest implants and replacements and other surgeries which are by their very nature designed to delay the inevitable.

A long life that ends in death by natural causes is proving to be something of a contradiction in terms. It seems we can either have one or the other, but not both.


… valiantly fending off decrepitude


My old childhood friend Jim Gillis died earlier this year, one month shy of his 64th birthday. Sergio Marchionne, the unconventional CEO credited with saving both the Fiat and Chrysler auto lines, died last month from complications related to shoulder surgery, at the age of 66. And everyone’s favorite roustabout, Thomas Aquinas (1225 – 1274), still a philosophical and theological touchstone all these years later, never made it to 50.

Euthanasia and doctor-assisted suicide are popular trends that smack of a disregard and disrespect for life. And we are told to be wary of a looming prospect: Nameless bureaucrats responsible for administering government-managed healthcare whose primary mission is to “keep costs down.” Thereby determining the limits of care and treatment based solely on balance sheet considerations.

Yet the system now in place actually functions at the opposite end of the concern continuum. Rather than care being rationed, what we have is a system that positively lavishes care upon us in an extravagant and thoroughly uncoordinated manner.

The medical profession as it is presently organized seems to operate with blinders on. Though individual practitioners are eminently well-meaning, the overarching umbrella under which they operate is unable or unwilling to consider the whole person. Each specialty of medicine functions as its own entity, and has only one speed: to busy itself doing anything and everything it can to keep an older individual alive for as long as possible, regardless of any other mitigating circumstances.


… functioning at the opposite end of the concern continuum


We are instructed that life must be respected from “inception to natural death.” Defining when inception begins has been aided greatly by advances in medical technology. But defining what constitutes a natural death is getting harder to pin down every day, what with the bevy of new medical procedures that continue to proliferate.

Both my parents died five years ago, within six months of each other. Dad was shy of 86, while Mom had reached her 88th birthday. Their respective experiences with medicine and healthcare during the latter stages of their lives have informed my opinion on this matter.

My mother’s health had been failing for years. She suffered from high blood pressure her entire adult life, the result of her fifth, and next-to-last, pregnancy. Diabetes was also a condition she became very familiar with, and arthritis eventually kicked in, with a thud. By the time my parents moved in with us in 2004, her mobility had become severely limited. Going to see her phalanx of doctors was quite a chore for her, as well as for my father, the reliable chauffeur.

Occasionally Mom would get checked into the hospital for a day or two, for tests and monitoring. On one such occasion, one of the many specialists with whom she had a long-term relationship, a truly salt-of-the-earth gentlemen, decided that she needed a pacemaker installed. It all happened very quickly. It seemed this operation was green-lighted without my father’s full knowledge, or at least without him being fully cognizant of what was being proposed.

What was supposed to be a short visit turned into a week-long stay, as my mother recovered from this unplanned surgery. When she did come home from the hospital this time, she was 100% immobile. Now confined to a wheelchair at all times, she was permanently hunched over, with both hands curled from severe arthritis, her fingers completely unresponsive. While we tried in-home nurse care for a short period, soon we had no choice but to place her in a long-term care facility.


… receiving kind and considerate care, without exception


Every staff member we encountered at this facility was kind and considerate, without exception. My father visited Mom every day. They had lunch and said the Rosary together, until his own health started to fail and he could no longer physically manage to make the trip.

We picked up the slack to some degree, visiting every Sunday with the kids still living at home. We would all have lunch in one of any number of appealing dining areas, after which we would wheel Mom outside to the koi pond. Or to the edge of the adjoining field, where she would try to tilt her head up for brief periods, and watch the horses roam around the neighboring farm.

I readily admit that every such visit, though tedious at times, created a lasting impression and was an edifying experience for me, my wife, and our children. But there is also no getting around the fact that my mother was essentially being warehoused, albeit in a very clean and extremely pleasant environment, for the last few years of her life.

Much to everyone’s surprise, it was my father who left us first. He took a bad a fall in the middle of the night on a Monday in November. I found him at 4:00 am the next morning, curled up on the floor and moaning. I struggled to get him up and into his favorite easy chair, and then I wept like a child. He was mumbling a little, obviously not himself. But he did continue to say, with a familiar lilt in his voice, “I’m alright,” and “I’m not going to die.”


… a bad fall in the middle of the night


After getting him settled in and comfortable, my wife and I decided there was nothing more to be done for him at that precise moment, and I should go to work as per usual.

We monitored my father’s condition throughout that first day, and given the fact that he took some food at lunch, we thought he might be recovering on his own. By the middle of the next day (Wednesday), however, even we realized this was going to require medical attention. We called one of his doctors around noon, and the receptionist called back within minutes to say we should take Dad to the emergency room immediately.

We felt a little stupid for not thinking of this sooner ourselves. After entering through the ER, Dad was soon admitted into the ICU, where they kept him for a couple of days, doing tests and monitoring his condition.

Visiting him in the hospital that Friday night, he was calm and composed but still not himself. His fall was a turning point. Something had irrevocably changed. It was clear as could be that he was now ready to die. One of his doctors (the cardiologist?) was due in the next morning to perform an evaluation. As he lay upright in bed my father quietly told me, without a trace of animosity in his weak voice, “They are the enemy now.”


… they are the enemy now


When I got up to leave and reached the door of his hospital room, I turned to take one last look. He was lying on his back, his head centered perfectly on the pillow. The headboard light was casting a diffused glow over my father’s head. His eyes were closed, and he struck me as being the epitome of a man at peace with his impending demise. All signs pointed to this being the end, and I went home that night to acclimate myself to this reality.

But bright and early the next morning one of my father’s doctors (was it the cardiologist?) stopped by, right on schedule. (He had been notified as soon as my father had been formally admitted into the ICU. It just takes a few days for these busy physicians to work in a last-minute request for a hospital visit.)

This man reviewed the pertinent EKG that sunny Saturday, declared my father’s fall had not resulted in any permanent cognitive damage, and confidently proscribed physical therapy as being the only thing needed in order for my decrepit Dad to return to his intellectually spry, pre-fall self.

It should be noted this optimistic evaluation was made simply by reviewing the test on a computer screen perched at the Nurses’ Station there in the ICU. The doctor in question did not actually venture into my father’s room and encounter the patient in person. Even though my father was lying motionless in bed, much as I had left him the night before, just a few steps from the computer screen at the Nurses’ Station.


… no need to actually examine the patient


I was, of course, stunned by this diagnosis. But feeling quite out of my league, I acquiesced to the professional’s opinion, and started to make arrangements to have my father admitted to the same wonderful long-term care facility where my mother had been firmly ensconced for the last few years.

And so began a three-week odyssey I hope never to repeat again, for as long as I may live. It was Sunday afternoon when I and two of our sons drove my father the short distance from the hospital to the facility. Starting at the hospital, just getting him out of his wheelchair into the car was a job that took all three of us to manage. He was still not himself, mumbling absent-mindedly, wondering what was happening and where we were taking him.

At the long-term care facility, we were informed my father would be receiving immediate attention from the staff, specifically from the physical therapist and the speech therapist. But as it was Sunday most of that staff was off, so things would really get started the next day, we were assured.

The next day came and things really didn’t get started. The therapists and their staffs were already very busy with existing patients, as it turned out. Interviewing and integrating a new patient into their programs would not be happening instantaneously. I had to dial back my expectations a bit. The “care manager” assigned to my father’s “case,” who I was now dealing with primarily over the phone, was extremely solicitous and reassuring, though, and this kept my worries at bay.


… not wanting to eat says it all


In those first few frustrating days, waiting for my father to be brought in to see the physical and speech therapists, I would visit at mealtime. Naturally they positioned my parents at the same table in the dining room of their wing. It was a comical scene. My father sat upright in his wheelchair, eyes closed, more-or-less asleep. My mother, short of stature to begin with, was now so hunched over in her wheelchair by virtue of her arthritis that her head was almost in her bowl of soup.

With great effort Mom would turn her eyes my way, and ask how Dad was. Dad was oblivious to the fact that his wife of over sixty years was at the same table. He was actually oblivious to everything. I would try to get him to eat, by bringing the spoon up to his lips. His eyes would flicker open for a brief moment, but his lips remained sealed shut the entire time at table.

After a few days of this I began to seriously doubt what my father was doing here, and what all of this was supposed to accomplish. But as we were still waiting for the speech and physical therapists to see my father and begin to work their magic, I kept my concerns to myself.

At the end of that first week one of the therapists – I forget which one – visited us in the dining room at lunchtime. This cheerful person directed what she had to say to me, since my father was, well, completely out of it. She described an ambitious program she was prepared to launch into, the success of which would naturally depend on my father’s cooperation and participation.

But he’s not eating anything, I pointed out. Yes, she said, that is a problem. He will have to eat if he is to recover and get better. As we rolled into the second week I honestly cannot remember the exact sequence of events. I do believe my father finally got in front of both therapists. But since his appearance at mealtime had remained the same, and since he was still not eating anything, it was becoming glaringly obvious – at least to me – that this was a lost cause.


… being able to recognize when the end has arrived


In addition to the facility’s therapeutic staff, my father was also visited by one or more of his doctors along the way. They came and went without notice. I would be told of these outside visits after the fact, by the “care manager.”

What did it all mean? What was the professional consensus? There were a lot of cooks in the kitchen by this point, but nobody was in charge of providing an overview. Each “specialist” was simply plugging away, doing their thing, providing their particular service. The role of the “care manager” was apparently confined to simply recording and reporting activity.

Finally on Wednesday of the third week, I got up the courage to ask the “care manager” the burning question that had been on the tip of my tongue all this time. At what point will all you fine, caring people acknowledge the obvious, and allow my father to die in peace?

“Oh Mr. Cavanaugh,” this very courteous woman replied, “it’s up to the family to tell us what they want us to do. It is never our place to recommend anything that even remotely hints at stopping treatment in any way, shape, or form.” And there you have what I consider to be the giant conundrum at the heart of our present healthcare system, folks.


… each specialist plugging away, with no overview provided


I had spent almost three weeks taking the advice of the medical professionals, against my better judgement, only to be told at the end of the ordeal that they were all waiting for me to politely tell them to back off.

Dad finally took his last breath that Saturday night, December 1. We all visited him early in the evening, after Vigil Mass. He was gasping for air at that point, and I doubt he knew we were in the room. Having gone home, we were called at 11:30 pm and told he had expired. I hope he will forgive my failure to properly implement his directive from three weeks prior. I hope he has already forgiven me.

Mom was predictably distraught at her husband’s death, but was unable to do anything more than partially engage. She was in a room across the hall, but might as well have been miles away. Though we briefly considered making extraordinary arrangements, we finally had to admit getting her to Dad’s funeral was thoroughly impractical, given her own fragile condition.

When she herself passed away the following August 1, one of her long-time physicians (the guy who ordered the pacemaker installed?) called me at 10:30 pm to offer his heartfelt condolences. It was a very kind gesture and I was genuinely touched by his concern.

But again, Mom was 88 when she died, and had been hanging on by a thread for years. Is it really so callous or morbid to ask: At what point do we realize this life is not all there is? At what point do we begin to confront and consider the four last things? When do allow ourselves and our loved ones to disengage from the pedestrian routines of this world, this vale of tears, so as to shuffle off this mortal coil at long last?

Robert J. Cavanaugh, Jr.
August 12, 2018

Use the contact form below to email me.

3 + 10 =

Running From Applause

Running From Applause

July 30, 2018 (486 words) The story is told of Jesus feeding a hungry multitude from what at first appeared to be a meager pantry. In a surprise turn of events, not only was everyone in attendance able to eat their fill that day, free of charge, but there were prodigious left-overs to spare. The crowd cheered what they rightly took to be a miraculous event. “This is truly the Prophet,” they said, “the one who is to come into the world.” But Jesus ran from the applause, so to speak. Worldly acclaim was not his objective. His took his leave and withdrew again to the mountain alone, there to engage in further prayer and contemplation. His concern was for the people. Amazed at having been unexpectedly satiated, they were in danger of missing the deeper message he was sent among us to teach. This world has always been a noisy and distracting place. It has always been easy for us to miss the deeper message. To be thrown off by a momentary manipulation of ways and means that dazzles the senses.

… a momentary manipulation of ways and means


But perhaps today we have reached an apex of distraction. And conducting ourselves as thoroughly modern citizens, we bask in a society-wide promotion of “freedom” and “liberty.” This is responsible for a major paradigm shift in how we, the people, strut and fret our hour upon this temporary stage. We have shed the idea of one’s character being a work-in-progress, requiring the strenuous application of native intelligence and practical reason in a non-stop effort to outgrow an inbred inclination toward self-absorption. Life is no longer about learning how to conduct oneself in a manner that respects the dignity of those around us. Now the general consensus is that we are each already perfect just the way we are. The only mission any of us has in this world is to “be true to ourselves,” and to “express who we really are.” This is the underlying legacy of “freedom” and “liberty” the conservatives are always crowing about. They specialize in applying it to the realm of public, economic behavior, yet are dumb-founded when liberals intuit the very same concepts to private behavior of a sexual nature. It’s the entire modern experiment that needs to be re-evaluated. Both sides of the ideological divide have it all wrong. We are supposed to be doing more with our lives that merely pursing an endless advance of our material circumstances. Or, more than indulging a headstrong insistence on the pursuit and justification of whatever sexual impulse we happen to be tempted by. In this context, we should be wary of applause, and of allowing our senses to be dazzled. We should instead consider spending more time in prayer and contemplation, in the hope of grasping a bit of Christ’s deeper message. Robert J. Cavanaugh, Jr. July 30, 2018

Use the contact form below to email me.

10 + 14 =